|
|
|
|
유미 ( Yu Mi ) - 경상대학교 간호대학
은영 ( Eun Young ) - 경상대학교 간호대학
( White KA ) - Georgetown University School of Nursing and Health Studies
강경자 ( Kang Kyung-Ja ) - 제주대학교 간호대학
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to adapt, modify, and validate the Nursing Anxiety and Self-Confidence with Clinical Decision-Making Scale (NASC-CDMⓒ) for Korean nursing students.
Methods: Participants were 183 nursing students with clinical practice experience in two nursing colleges. The construct validity and reliability of the final Korean version of the NASC-CDMⓒ were examined using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses and testing of internal consistency reliability. For adaptation and modification, the instrument was translated from English to Korean. Expert review and a cross-sectional survey were used to test the instrument’s validity.
Results: The Korean version of the NASC-CDMⓒ (KNASC-CDM) was composed of 23 items divided into four dimensions: (i) Listening fully and using resources to gather information; (ii) Using information to see the big picture; (iii) Knowing and acting; and (iv) Seeking information from clinical instructors. The instrument explained 60.1% of the total variance for self-confidence and 63.1% of the variance for anxiety; Cronbach’s a was .93 for self-confidence and .95 for anxiety.
Conclusion: The KNASC-CDM can be used to identify anxiety and self-confidence in nursing students’ clinical decision-making in Korea. However, further research should be done to test this instrument, as it is classified differently from the original NASC-CDMⓒ version.
|
|
|
KeyWords
|
|
불안, 임상의사결정, 간호대학생, 신뢰도와 타당도
Anxiety, Clinical Decision-Making, Nursing Students, Reliability and Validity
|
|
|
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
|
|
|
|
|
등재저널 정보
|
|
   
|
|
|
|
|